At first glance, the "Voynich manuscript" appears to be not unlike any other antique work of writing and drawing.An alien language But a second, closer look reveals that nothing here is what it seems.
I presume he meant that this section of Daniel makes a specific messianic prediction which Jesus fulfilled.
Therefore, theism and Christianity have something strong in their favor against atheism and skepticism.
I spent much of last week at a theism/intelligent design website debating (and defending) the rational merits of atheism.
It was both fun and head-scratching, mainly because anti-atheists refuse to grant that atheism is .
But they still haven't figured it out." A chemist and archaeological scientist by training, Hodgins works for the NSF Arizona Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, or AMS, Laboratory, which is shared between physics and geosciences.
His team was able to nail down the time when the Voynich manuscript was made.
How could the author of the Book of Daniel make such an error if he lived and wrote at the time indicated?
The author of the Book of Daniel seems to place the rule of Cyrus after that of Darius, again an inexplicable error for an author contemporary with these events.
The conservative view that the Bible was authored by the individuals it names clashes with the liberal assertion that the people at the time were illiterate, or that the Hebrew language did not even exist then.